A lot of people have seem to have decided that drag queens for children is the hill they want to die on. I wonder how the world would react if they decided to promote "Stripper story hour" instead of drag queen story hour. How dare anyone shame them for this? The audacity. The parents who don't want their children to be exposed to strippers are bigots and are obviously misogynist and sexist.
Latest in this saga is Bif Naked, the Canadian singer-songwriter, who is selling Pride shirts that read "Drag is not a crime" on her Facebook page. The proceeds from the sales are going towards supporting Drag Queen Story Hour, an organization that provides storytime events for children hosted by drag queens. It comes at a time when Tennessee has passed a new law that bans drag performances for children, citing concerns over "sexual content" and "inappropriate behavior".
The law has sparked a debate over the role of drag queens in society, and whether they should be allowed to perform for children. Supporters argue that drag performances are a form of artistic expression that promotes diversity and acceptance, and that children should be exposed to different forms of creativity. Opponents, on the other hand, argue that drag performances are inappropriate for children and can expose them to sexual themes that they are not ready to understand.
What do you think? Should children be exposed to drag queens for the sake of diversity and inclusion?
